Sustainability is a vague idea. How do you define sustainability in the natural rubber sector?

I think sustainability is vague if you have not looked at it with a good set of eyes. If you see it as a concept, then it certainly is not vague. Many standards have been introduced in the last 30 years and organisations and stakeholders have worked around this concept. The sustainability concept is evolving and is very well defined in the areas we operate in nowadays.

GPSNR defines sustainability through a multi-stakeholder process where we bring in members of GPSNR together. Our organisation represents all parts of the supply chain, from smallholders to processors and traders to manufacturers and civil society. Today, we represent about 60 percent of the global natural rubber volume.

Our supply chain sustainability commitments include the environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. The definition of sustainability for our members is now very well defined through a document, which is approved and called the policy framework document. This is a set of eight overarching themes that include commitments to legal compliance, community livelihoods, healthy and functioning ecosystems (including no deforestation) and respecting all human rights. Our GPSNR members need to have policies aligned for the production and procurement of sustainable natural rubber.

The great news is that after the document was approved last year, the GPSNR members are now aligning and publishing policies to be in line with this framework. Of course, these are commitments that do not explicitly mean implementation. Now the next step for us would be reporting requirements for our members. The members will have to publish reports every year, and we are defining the requirements for these reports now. For them,           it will be to demonstrate how they are reaching this commitment. We are also working on implementation guidance that will help companies implement an assurance model. It aims to understand the different risks and identify the modes of assurance based on the level of risk. It ensures that the commitments are met and that any claim the company makes on sustainability is verified.

Would there be any mechanism to know how companies are implementing the policies?

For GPSNR, it is not about reinventing the wheel. We don't want to create another certification standard. We have certification systems out there. I think, especially in the rubber sector, we need something that goes a bit broader than the current specification for certification because we have 85 percent production coming from independent smallholders, owning 1-2 hectares of land each, which makes it quite challenging to scale up certification promptly. So we are building up an assurance model, which is going to be a risk basis. The basic idea behind this is that instead of having a standard where you have to tick all the boxes of the standard, we will look at your situation. We are going to have a map of risk globally. So, based on the level of risk, we ask our members to have different levels of assurance.

For example, if we are sourcing from a place where everything was developed years ago, your risk of deforestation might be low. We might not require you to do a full deforestation assessment. Or maybe your risk in the supply chain is very high in terms of labour with migrants; we will ask you to have a more in-depth and third party assessment for that.

And this way, we hope to be able to bring down the cost of assurance and make the process a bit linear so that we can focus on what matters.

GPSNR was established in 2019. Could you highlight the achievements of GPSNR so far?

We are quite a young organisation considering it is a multi-stakeholder organisation. We started with just 11 members.  , we soon had 16-17 members, including some processors and traders in automotive, but now we are reaching 130 members.

As mentioned earlier, today, our members represent well above 50 percent of the global rubber market volume. Even if you compare it to other similar organisations with long-standing in other commodities, we are far above what others have seen in terms of representation. One of the most significant achievements that I would mention is the policy framework and its commitments and the ability to align the members with it to make a difference in the natural rubber supply chain.

I feel very confident that through this change, we will be able to reach the smallholders and improve their situation, which is really at the heart of GPSNR.

How do you make sure that there will be traceability and transparency in case of violation of rights?

That's a fair point. One of the key things that we managed to ensure is that smallholders are included in decision making in GPSNR processes. So now we have 28 smallholders that represent 8  different countries at the moment. They're a part of GPSNR as members, but they don't pay any fees.

They have been selected the representatives  through workshops conducted by us. Several smallholders participated in the workshops, and I do think that we're trying our utmost to ensure that their participation is meaningful. They understand how to engage in the platform and how to make their voice heard within the platform.

We ensure that everything GPSNR is doing is co-designed with smallholders. I don't mean to say that we represent all the seven million smallholders out there, but we're making strides as much as possible.

In terms of the grievances, we have set up a grievance mechanism that is open and transparent. Any stakeholder now can file complaints through GPSNR, and an independent panel of experts would review this. We hope to ensure that there is at least a communication channel and ways to address discrepancies through that system.

I think traceability can be defined in very different ways. So, traceability, in my mind, is knowing from where a specific batch of rubber is coming and keeping it separate from others in the supply chain.There is some merit to that and some approaches to do a certification. We need to look at transparency to ensure that companies know where we are sourcing from. They have to take responsibility for their suppliers' operations as if it was their operations.

What are the steps undertaken by GPSNR to curb illegal activities of companies like land grabbing etc.?

I think the first and most crucial step is to identify what can and cannot be done, because, unfortunately, in developing countries, maybe at times, the legal requirements do not match with the social licence to operate requirements expected in the sustainable world. That's one aspect, and there's also the enforcement, and due diligence might not be as good as expected. So, I don't think that the policy framework of GPSNR does a very good job in identifying what those do's and don'ts are. As for GPSNR members, I do believe strongly that the policies that are now in place will set a good foundation to ensure that the buyers will trigger these requirements down the supply chain.

We have seen that due diligence can only stop deforestation and land grabbing and other such activities in the entire supply chain to some extent. What we need is incentives, and that's why one of the critical challenges that we're finding in GPSNR is to identify how we can bring up financial and non-financial  incentives to companies and smallholders to operate sustainably.

For example, we have a working group on shared responsibility looking at how the companies can act together to solve issues that cannot be solved by a single company on its own. I deeply believe that most of these issues are linked to livelihood. May be we need to ensure that they get the right amount of compensation for their rubber production so that they don't have to open up another hectare to meet their livelihoods requirements.

Would you be working with the government in different countries? How difficult is it to work with the government?

GPSNR does not have direct government involvement, but we do collaborate with them. We have an MoU with IRSG, the international rubber research organisation. So by working with them, we have set up a series of dialogues with governments where we brought up, in the past year, the work of GPSNR, seeking opportunities to collaborate.

We are in touch with the local government agencies to ensure that we have public and private partnerships. Governments are key stakeholders, and especially when we want to reach smallholders at a large scale, we cannot forget to ensure that the governments are involved in the work we do.

Nineteen leading companies have joined your organisation. How difficult do you find it to make standard solutions?

Well, that's the beauty of the multi-state process and co-design process. So, it took a while, but the policy framework was designed with the input of all members. Everyone had the chance to chip in and find a synergistic approach together with the civil society organisations.

I think it's also doable as the world is becoming more global. There are differences in how the companies operate, but the global expectations are quite clear to everyone and every company as all aim to become global leaders. And that has helped in aligning the expectations.

You have around 130 members at present. How do you want to expand?

Until now, the membership that we've seen coming in is mostly from within the tyre sector. We are having discussions and interest from potential members outside the tyre sector but still in the rubber sector. Our setup already allows for the inclusion of known tyre members, but we're not just a tyre-focused association; we are a natural rubber-focused association. So the door is open for these entities, which is the focus of our expansion.

What are the challenges?

Covid has not been easy, but in a multi-stakeholder organisation, we're trying to build trust among our members for them to work together. We are human, so we're social animals, and trust is created by having interactions. So building trust has been really challenging.

But I do hope that as we come out of this crisis, this becomes easier for us as we want to reinstate physical gatherings and get our members together, which will help us move faster than we are today.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Italian bicycle tyre manufacturer Vittoria has launched Tire Finder, a digital tool on its website designed to streamline the tyre selection process. The platform offers a personalised recommendation system that guides each cyclist towards the most suitable Vittoria products based on individual riding profiles.

The tool operates by posing a structured series of queries regarding a rider’s preferred discipline, style, terrain, priorities and performance goals. Responses generate a tailored selection, complete with explanations for each recommendation, covering road, mountain bike, gravel, BMX and commuting applications. An additional Mix & Match feature enables customised front and rear combinations to enhance grip, rolling efficiency and control for specific performance targets.

Catering to novices purchasing their first tyres and experienced racers seeking specialised setups, Tire Finder simplifies the decision-making process. The system delivers a personalised configuration that prioritises the rider’s specific ambitions, ensuring an informed and efficient path to the ideal tyre arrangement.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Michelin has introduced the MICHELIN Primacy 5 in India, marking a pivotal development for the tyre manufacturer as it represents the first passenger car tyre produced locally by the company. This new premium offering is specifically engineered for sedans and sport utility vehicles, signifying an important progression in Michelin’s operational footprint within the Indian automotive market.

The latest tyre is designed to accommodate the varied powertrains present in the contemporary automotive landscape, serving internal combustion engine vehicles, hybrids and electric vehicles equally. Through the application of sophisticated tread pattern optimisation and next-generation rubber compounds, the Primacy 5 aims to provide a balance of enduring safety, ride comfort, responsive handling and enhanced energy efficiency.

Performance metrics for the new tyre demonstrate substantial advancements in safety and durability. Compared to its direct competitors, the Primacy 5 offers considerably shorter wet braking distances for both new and worn tyres, along with improved dry braking performance. It also provides an eight percent increase in overall mileage over its predecessor, the Primacy 4ST, achieved through the integration of EverTread and EverGrip technologies that sustain grip throughout the tyre’s lifespan. Additionally, the tyre sets a new standard for ride comfort with a nine percent better comfort score than rivals, attributed to a noise-attenuating tread pattern, while also delivering a six and a half percent improvement in energy efficiency.

Having received the Tyre of the Year 2025 accolade at the Tire Technology International Awards, the Primacy 5 is slated for commercial release starting August 2026. Upon launch, it will be accessible to customers through Michelin’s own retail network and a nationwide distribution channel of approximately 800 authorised dealers.

Shantanu Deshpande, Managing Director, Michelin India, said, “India’s premium mobility landscape is evolving rapidly with growing demand for high-performance, safe and sustainable tyre solutions across sedans, SUVs and electric vehicles. The launch of the Made-in-India MICHELIN Primacy 5 marks a significant milestone for Michelin in the country and reflects our commitment to delivering products that are tailored to the needs of Indian consumers. Manufactured in India for Indian drivers, the Primacy 5 has been developed and tested on the vehicles most driven in the country, benchmarked against leading competitors, and validated by an independent testing agency. By combining Michelin’s latest global tyre technologies with local manufacturing expertise, the Primacy 5 is uniquely positioned to meet the evolving expectations of Indian motorists for superior safety, longer tyre life, enhanced comfort, energy efficiency and everyday performance. India continues to be a key growth market for the Michelin Group, and as we expand our retail presence and strengthen our manufacturing and service ecosystem in the country, we remain committed to bringing world-class mobility solutions closer to our customers while contributing to India's manufacturing ambitions.”

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

VMI has secured the prestigious EcoVadis Platinum Medal, the highest possible distinction within the internationally recognised sustainability benchmark. This coveted recognition positions the Dutch company within the top one percent of all enterprises evaluated globally, a ranking determined by rigorous analysis of environmental practices, ethical conduct, labour and human rights standards and sustainable procurement policies.

This year’s Platinum accolade represents a significant advancement from the Gold rating VMI earned in 2025, underscoring a dedicated trajectory of enhanced corporate responsibility. The upgraded status highlights the organisation’s persistent drive to elevate its ecological and social governance benchmarks beyond its previous high standards.

The momentum behind this elevated rating stems from several key corporate initiatives launched over the past year. These include the institution of the enterprise-wide ‘We green it together’ programme, designed to empower diverse teams to achieve specific sustainability objectives, alongside the formal adoption of the VMI Sustainability Manifesto, which articulates long-term aspirations. The recent publication of the 2025 Sustainability Report further complements these efforts by transparently detailing the company’s measurable progress against its established targets.

Harm Voortman, President and CEO of VMI Group, said, “Receiving the EcoVadis Platinum Medal is a proud milestone for VMI and we share this medal with all our employees around the world. This recognition reflects the progress we have made in integrating sustainability into every aspect of our business. From designing more sustainable machines together with our customers to working closely with our suppliers, we continue to improve the sustainability of both our products and our operations. While we are proud to have progressed from Silver to Gold and now Platinum, we see this as a milestone in our journey to build a sustainable future.”

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Hankook Tire, the exclusive tyre supplier for the ABB FIA Formula E World Championship, played a central role in the season’s pivotal Japanese double-header. As the official race tyre for all competitors, the company’s iON Race compound was put to the test under extreme and shifting conditions during Rounds 14 and 15 of Season 12 at the 2026 TDK Tokyo E-Prix.

The weekend’s on-track action produced two dramatic winners. CUPRA KIRO’s Dan Ticktum snatched victory in Round 14 with a last-corner overtake on Jake Dennis, while Nick Cassidy completed the podium. The following day, Mahindra Racing’s Nyck de Vries claimed Round 15, finishing ahead of Cassidy and Dennis, who secured second and third respectively. The entire paddock also observed a period of remembrance for the late Cyril Blais.

The 2.575-kilometre temporary circuit, featuring 18 corners and situated around Tokyo Big Sight, hosted its first-ever night races, drastically altering track conditions from practice to competition. Unstable weather compounded the challenge, with a Sunday thunderstorm cancelling Free Practice 3 and leaving a damp, drying surface for Round 15 that demanded constant adaptation in tyre warm-up and strategy.

Throughout the weekend, Hankook’s iON Race tyre demonstrated reliability across the evolving grip levels and temperature swings. Following the Tokyo results, Dennis retains the championship lead with 146 points, narrowly ahead of Mitch Evans and Pascal Wehrlein. The title battle remains fiercely contested and will be resolved at the season-ending Hankook London E-Prix double-header on 15–16 August.

Manfred Sandbichler, Senior Director, Hankook Motorsport, said, “Bringing Formula E night racing to Tokyo for the first time made this a distinctive weekend and one of the more unusual tyre assignments of our season. The contrast between afternoon running and the 20:05 races shaped how teams prepared for both events, and the iON Race managed that transition and the changing weather conditions well, delivering consistent and predictable performance as the circuit cooled through the evening.”

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!